For the school year 2014/15 I chose to teach Apologia Exploring
Creation through Physical Science at our co-op. This is the 3rd
Apologia course I have taught at co-op and by far my favorite. I’m sure it has
something to do with the fact that physics is introduced and that happens to be
my favorite area of scientific study, but also the materials are well written and
I was able to incorporate the student notebooks and instructional DVD which
helped provide a richer experience.
Overview
This is the general description of Exploring Creation through
Physical Science provided by Apologia:
This course is designed to be the last science
course the student takes before high school biology. Thus, we generally
recommend it as an 8th grade course. However, your student can also use it for
their 9th grade course work. The text discusses such topics as the atmosphere,
the hydrosphere, weather, the structure of the earth, environmentalism, the
physics of motion, Newton’s Laws, gravity, and astrophysics. The author
especially concentrates on the myths generated by the hysterical
environmentalist movement. There are many hands-on experiments to do, and they
all use household chemicals and supplies. It is an excellent course for
preparing the student to take a college-prep high school science curriculum.
The text was written by Dr. Jay Wile. It approaches physical
science through a creationist perspective.
Prerequisites
Although this course doesn’t have any prerequisites listed, I
feel that it is very important that a student already have experience with
Algebra before taking this course, or at least be taking Algebra in the same
year. In the second half of the course when
they encounter physics, they will certainly need this skill.
Apologia does offer links and help for those who haven’t
taken Algebra or who need a refresher, but I have found among my students that
this has added a stress. We are dealing
with a generation of children who are scared of math and who have been told
they won’t need higher math skills for the “real world”. I think this contributes to this fear and
avoidance behavior, but none the less, having never done Algebra and then being
asked to calculate acceleration is just simply overwhelming. The conversations seem to be the trickiest
problems for them.
I consider Physical Science to be the continuation of
General Science. With both courses students will cover a basic understanding of
the study of science (scientific method, designing experiments) physics (simple
machines, the physics of motion, Newton’s Laws, gravity, and astrophysics),
earth science (archaeology, geology, paleontology, atmosphere, the hydrosphere,
weather, the structure of the earth, environmentalism) and life science (biology,
and human anatomy and physiology). Having exposure to and a foundational
knowledge of all of these areas of study will prove to be very helpful as
students progress on to high school sciences such as biology, chemistry, and
physics. I’ve already seen through my
own students how having taken general science prepared them for taking biology.
Physical science will be a helpful preparation for physics. I think it is wise to take both of these
courses over two years before progressing on to other sciences, even if that
means the student gets a late start by taking Physical Science as a 9th
grader.
Having said that, I taught them out of order. I taught General Science,
Biology, and then Physical Science. The
reasons for this were really specific to our groups needs at the time and I
felt like with the students I had, that they could handle the course work of
Biology. Biology also tied in nicely with the end of General Science which
covers biology, anatomy and physiology. It requires no extra math courses
either. So it made sense at the time because my own daughter hadn't taken Algebra yet. I wouldn’t suggest that for every group or student. You could teach Physical Science and then
General Science, but you would need to give the students an over view of the
scientific method and laboratory procedures first, and students would need to
have experience with Algebra in the 7th grade which isn’t likely.
Our Class Plan
Physical Science covers two main areas of study, earth
science and physics. There are 16 Modules (chapters) in this course. This broke down nicely to cover the first 8
in our first semester and we are covering the last 8 in our current
semester. We only have 30 weeks in our
co-op year so I started the class a week early both semesters. We’ve had a lot of illnesses and bad weather
too, so we have been slowed down a little, but I still believe we will finish
on time. You should need no more than 32
weeks if you cover 1 module every 2 weeks.
Course Materials
I chose to use the textbook, solutions manual, student
notebook, and instructional DVDs. Having taught general science and biology
without the student notebook and instructional DVDs, I can honestly say these
were welcomed additions.
The textbook is dry. It is heavy on text and not very visual. This may bother some people. I think you can supplement with the Internet
for those visual learners, but if you are looking for a textbook that is both
rich in text and visually pleasing, this isn’t the one for you.
Unless your student is particularly gifted in science and a self-motivator,
I will go as far to say that the notebook is essential. It not only acts as a workbook, but it guides
the student through their reading, prompting them to take notes on important
concepts. It includes all the On Your
Own Questions, Study Guide Questions, Laboratory Reports, and Module Summaries.
This made it so easy for me as a teacher to check the students’ work because everything
was in one place and organized well. I
didn’t check for every right answer, mainly only to make sure they did the
work. I left it to their parents to
check for correctness. I would like to
see the Module Summary included in the Module in the student notebook. Right
now it is at the end of the book as if a second thought. We’ve found the
summaries very helpful.
The Instructional DVD was very helpful to me personally, and
I think the students have benefited as well. Instead of preparing lectures, I was
able to just pop the DVD in, or before lab class I could watch the videos to
get my bearings instead of reading pages and pages of text. While the students watched the video they
would fill in the summary in their student notebook. We started by reading the questions first,
then as we watched the DVD they would know what key points to be listening for.
As we’ve progressed through the course, they don’t need to do this any longer
as a group. They scan the questions before we start and we get going right
away. After a section of video we review the summary questions and I answer any
questions they may have. As 8th
and 9th graders, most of these students don’t yet have the note
taking skills necessary to listen effectively to a lecture and pull out all of
the important information, so this helps to bridge that gap. Instead of the current summary, I think it would
be great to have something like it that the students could fill in as they go,
but specifically designed to follow the DVDs.
Overall, I feel like the quality of the DVD could be a
little better. First, the videos are nearly as boring as reading the book. Why not utilize more graphics? Why does science (the study of creation) have to be so visually boring when creation is very obviously not?
Second, the editing leaves something to be desired. We have really come to
love Rusty Hughes. He reminds me of one
of my high school science teachers. He seems to have a genuine love of science.
The DVD contains lab experiments and often his experiments don’t turn out like
he expected them to; they are clumsy for a lack of a better word. Although this does bring a realistic quality
to the DVDs and make for some good laughs, I would prefer to just see how the experiment is really supposed to
work and not waste time while he fumbles to get things set up correctly. If an experiment doesn’t go as planned, why
not perform it again and put the successful version on the video? Or do a little video editing?
But again, I am
very pleased with the fact that this video instruction is offered for the
course and it has been a benefit to us.
Experiments
The experiments in this course are usually straight
forward. There have been a couple of experiments
whose instructions were a little confusing, but after a couple of attempts and
adjustments we were able to figure it out.
Some experiments are very simplistic and hardly worth our time. It was
easier to just watch the video and then move on to a more valuable experiment.
There are so many to choose from, it’s never a problem to fill our lab day with
fun experiments.
Each year I get a bit annoyed when I have to make a list of
supplies and amounts. Apologia provides
a list of supplies for each module, but it doesn’t include the amounts nor is
it broke down by experiment. You have
to go to each experiment in the book to get the specific list for that experiment
and the quantities. I don’t do every
experiment in the book so that means I have to create my own list. This would
save me so much time if they would provide a list for each module and include . It may seem like nitpicking, but you don’t
get what you don’t ask for.
In conclusion, I do really enjoy the Apologia science courses
and as I have said, this one is my favorite so far. There is room for improvement, but I plan on
sticking with their courses for all my children. Up until I started using them
in our homeschool, I had never had science taught to me through a creation
perspective. Although I found that I understood physics and excelled at it, all
other areas of science were very dull to me. Learning through a creation
perspective has helped me to appreciate science as I never had before and I
pray that my own children and students will never feel as if God’s creation is
a dry, dull desert, but instead a master creation made by a Master Creator who
wants them to understand their place in His master design.
No comments:
Post a Comment